I hope not. Fighting wars because it would be a waste not to is perhaps the stupidest reason to fight a war I can conceive. Well, except for this.
A few days ago I was talking to a coworker who is in the Reserves. He happened to mention that the munitions he uses often has very short expiry dates (3-5 years). This got me thinking. I wonder if you cross referenced weapons purchases and military engagements (of the USA and others) whether you would find the military engagements occurring just before the munitions were set to expire.
I hope not. Fighting wars because it would be a waste not to is perhaps the stupidest reason to fight a war I can conceive. Well, except for this.
1 Comment
![]() If a government employee were to go to your home and steal the flyers from the newspaper on your front step I am sure you would be very upset. It's not because the flyers were particularity valuable or that you ever intended to look at them. Its not even because you bought them, you didn't. Still you would resent it if the government took those flyers and gave them back to the companies who originally sent them out. You would feel that your rights had been violated. You would certainly feel that the government had no legitimate right to do what it did. What if I said the government did just this sort of thing last week? On Friday royal assent was given to a law extending copyright terms for recording artists from 50 years to 70 years. Others have noted that the commentators are being ridiculous in claiming artistic works are being 'protected' from the 'danger' of falling into the public domain. The public domain is not a negative status. Once in the public domain old works that had been gathering dust are often given new life as fresh eyes are able to take the old work and breathe new life into it. Extending copyright like this blocks interesting initiatives such as one Canadian's efforts to publish a public domain James Bond story. Of course the current extension only applies to sound recordings but that has always been the thin edge of the wedge. Once one copyright term is extended others are quick to go up too. After all, if one area deserves extra 'protection' certainly they all do. But copyright is, and always has been a balancing act involving the intellectual property holder and the public. The public has an interest in a work being unfettered by monopoly control, the copyright holder has an interest in maintaining that monopoly. Now, whether this has ever been a good bargain is debatable but a certain fact is clear: extending the copyright duration so that items do not fall into the public domain (perhaps ever) is theft. What bothers me is the lack of public outcry. The lack of political and media condemnation of the governing Conservatives for supporting this extension of economic protectionism and wasteful monopoly privileges. The Liberals were silent on the issue. The NDP were silent on the issue (and don't think I have forgotten their plan to create a pseudo-intellectual property right for sculptors). The Green Party was silent. No press releases. No promises to repeal this change upon taking office. Nothing. From any of them. Apparently, you can steal from Canadians and get away with it. |
James WilsonLikes: Government Transparency, Constitutional Monarchy, Politics Archives
November 2017
Categories
All
|